Search & answer engines
We take on a site and improve two related but genuinely different things: how well search engines rank it, and how reliably answer engines can quote it.
The second one is newer and widely misunderstood. AEO is not SEO with a new name. It rewards question-shaped headings, short self-contained answers near the top of a page, lists and tables that survive being extracted from their layout, declared entities, visible authorship and dates, and — most bluntly — whether your robots.txt lets AI crawlers in at all. A site can rank perfectly well and still be uncitable.
Evidence first, opinion second
We run this with an audit tool we built and maintain ourselves. It crawls every page of a site and scores it with a deterministic parser: each finding is a verified fact about the markup, not a judgement call. That evidence is then handed, identically, to four independent AI models, which argue about what it means and what to fix first.
Keeping those two halves separate is the whole point. Where all four models independently flag the same thing, it is almost certainly real. Where only one does, it is either an insight the others missed or an overreach — and you get to see which, instead of one blended voice telling you it is all urgent.
Three lenses on every page
- SEO — can search engines crawl, index, understand and rank this?
- AEO — can an answer engine lift a correct, attributable answer out of it and cite it?
- Accessibility & UX — can everyone actually use it?
We do the work, not just the report. Plenty of firms will sell you an audit and leave the fixing to you. We hand over the findings and then implement them.